A discussion on judges role in making law through their decisions

Some pluralist systems, such as Scots law in Scotland and so-called civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisianado not precisely fit into the dual "common-civil" law system classifications.

In criminal cases, especially, lawyers often make motions on critical issues of constitutional law, or the admissibility of evidence, without citation to any authority.

Boston University Law Review, 86, According to Raz, also, courts do develop the law; they do not as political agents but by working out the implications of internal legal considerations.

This is why we have an independent judiciary, so they are not subject to the whims of popular opinion. The Constitution requires interpretation, and some of its parts, for example, Articles 14, 19 and 21 are understood in moral terms also, such as fairness, reasonableness and equality.

Judges help mold the law, deciding issues never before addressed, or interpret and apply past decisions when the law is clear, but how it should be applied is in dispute. Finally, emotions and judgments likely reinforce one another through a recursive feedback loop, further complicating the picture.

This view has proved itself remarkably sticky even in modern times. With this theory Brennan picked up a theme earlier articulated by the late US Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo Cardozo,one that has been further echoed by prominent contemporary judges Posner,; Calabresi, Qualitative Research, 15, Efforts to ignore or suppress this reality are doomed to failure; efforts to understand and shape it can meaningfully advance justice.

In contrast, judges are thought to be uniquely capable of going about their business without emotional influences. It stands to reason that when something positive results from a decision, people are more likely to decide in a similar way, given a similar situation.

However, it has been questioned whether the word or expression must mean the same thing at all times regardless of times or circumstances?

The role of judges in making law in Uk courts - Essay Example

At the same time, however, it does not eliminate the scope for applying tests that are not tests solely of pedigree. Judges also have spoken eloquently of the role of mercy in their judgments Kennedy, An even smaller group of quantitatively oriented studies sheds some further light on judicial emotion.

These are of course very broad questions, but a serious research program to address them would be a service both to science and to the law.

By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally very short, referring only to statutes. And in case if there is any arbitrariness then legislature is always there to negate it down.

They attempt to insure that we have the most accurate and just rulings possible at lower levels.

Decision Making: Factors that Influence Decision Making, Heuristics Used, and Decision Outcomes

What the learned author has pointed out, and which creates serious problems for Dworkin, is that it may be hard for Hercules to determine what is law in a given situation because there may be a plurality of views as to what the moral answer is in that situation.

He is against the judge made law mainly because of two objections. Researching emotion in courts and the judiciary: It also is uneven. But this assumes that a judge, called upon to apply a rule by reference to the rule of recognition, will apply the rules accepted by his fellow judges.

When emergencies arise It is hard enough to address some legal issues when the judge has the time and resources, but even harder when a case presents itself for emergency resolution.

They also serve as an important check against lower court rulings that may have been flawed, and individual judges who have strayed from the legal path. Before taking a shot, she wanted to look at a treatise to be sure it was a duck — by which time the bird was out of range.Barak, Aharon, "A Judge on Judging: The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy" ().Faculty Scholarship Series.

democracy,5 which is not based solely on the rule of people through their representatives (formal democracy), but also on human rights but rather that their decisions are based on a legitimacy that precedes the rulings.

How judges make decisions. Share this: Email; it’s not just making decisions that is important, but making good ones (and expressing them clearly and succinctly). and how to instruct a. If you are asking if courts should have a role in making law through their decisions, then they have to have one -- they cannot do otherwise.

There is no way that courts can avoid making law when. The thesis of this paper is how judges help molding of law through their decisions and help future of course of action by law making body i.e.

the parliament. The legal systems of United Kingdom owe their origin to judges who made laws in the course of their decision making.

How judges make decisions

These believe their main function is to enforce rules of due process to ensure that the police act according to the law and uphold the rights of defendants. Elected official These are the most responsive to public opinion; the political impact of their decisions is one of their main concerns.

The Many Meanings of "Politics" in Judicial Decision Making Bradley W. Joondeph The role of politics in judicial decision making is a lively topic of conversation these days, as this symposium attests.

discretion in reaching their decisions. By its nature, law is incapable of.

A discussion on judges role in making law through their decisions
Rated 5/5 based on 100 review