In such cases, civil disobedience might be necessary. First, the International Energy Association IEA announced global greenhouse gas emissions hit record highs inthreatening to catapult Earth over the 2C rise in temperature that, scientists predict, will lead to cataclysmic changes.
So in answer to my own questions It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions.
Gandhi, in India chased the British away through non-violent methods. Nearly 30 years later, as climate change takes center stage as the defining issue of our time, many are wondering role civil disobedience might play in creating a tipping point beyond which business as usual will simply no longer be possible.
Marching on, producing salt and breaking the law, Gandhi took a stubborn stance, without violent means, showing that they would not handle the British rule anymore. Earlier this month, the government quietly tabled its annual report on how Canada is doing in meeting its targets under the Kyoto Protocol and other international obligations.
You may not agree with that, but the facts prove that the primary job of our government is to protect our rights; everything else was secondary. Likewise, PETA activists might have done a nude rally to raise awareness against wearing fur clothing.
And what of those whose job it is to uphold or enforce questionable laws enacted by government? It is just a way showing the love of nature to many and there is no reason why it is wrong to do so.
Can breaking the law ever be justified? They are made in order to keep the place safe and peaceful.
An act like this would be a justifiable reason to break the law. On no moral grounds can such a law that violates every basic right and freedom to which all humans are entitle can ever be justified.
Such waste of time can be justified by breaking or bending the law. There are numerous agencies dedicated to upholding, enforcing the laws passed by our government, but can you name one agency whose sole purpose is to investigate and prosecute violations of the law by our lawmakers themselves?
This might be appropriate in cases but not always. Can breaking the law ever be justified? To some they are freedom fighters and to others they are terrorists. And since there was no new oil and gas development in those waters, there was a definite thrill of victory.
Certainly, there have been laws implemented by governments that have been wrong and unjust, thus on what grounds are we morally obligated to obey these unjust laws? Personalities, heroes like Gandhi, Mandela and King will always be necessary.
To put this in perspective, when 50, people turned up at the National Mall to protest the Keystone XL pipeline last February, it was hailed as the " largest climate rally in US history.
When it involves taking a serious personal risk including the possibility of extended jail time - a genuine sacrifice. By the very act of drafting and signing the Declaration of Independence they were committing treason against their government. This established a happier independent India.
In such situations of urgency, our instincts work to find the best possible solution even though it might mean breaking the rule. This is a case where breaking the rule is justified. In both of those cases, I felt a sense of empowerment, for speaking truth to power.
Also, sometimes it is the rules that suppress the people. In the United States laws are enacted by government and are enforced by a myriad of agencies whose job it is to ensure the law is upheld. Times are changing and with them so will the wants of people. However, breaking the law is not always justified.
I do not deny that in freely exercising your rights you may find yourself in trouble with those whose job it is to enforce the law, but the fundamental question is, would you be justified in breaking a law because it violates your rights?
I do not think that shedding clothes will do more harm than create arguments among couples passing by. Is civil disobedience a tactic for catalyzing stronger and broader support for action - for growing the "movement" and achieving a specific outcome?
And what of those whose job it is to uphold or enforce questionable laws enacted by government?Jun 10, · When breaking the law is justified. eight-hour workday to women’s right to vote to the end of slavery — all of these involved good people willing to break the law.” more than ever.
Jul 22, · Hence sometimes, breaking the law can be justified. Breaking the rules can be the best thing to do in a particular situation. It may not be right according to the. Aug 26, · When an email from Tony Leiserowitz popped up on screen the other day, I was blown away to read the findings of his team's latest national survey.
Therefore, will all the information I have provided, do you think that breaking the law could ever be considered as justified? If by now you still think that obedience to the law is your civic duty, then go back to your TV and enjoy your servitude.
Hence sometimes, breaking the law can be justified. Breaking the rules can be the best thing to do in a particular situation. It may not be right according to the rules but it might be what the best thing to do is.
Sep 29, · Hence sometimes, breaking the law can be justified. Breaking the rules can be the best thing to do in a particular situation. It may not be right according to the .Download